We are upgrading the repository! A content freeze is in effect until December 6th, 2024 - no new submissions will be accepted; however, all content already published will remain publicly available. Please reach out to repository@u.library.arizona.edu with your questions, or if you are a UA affiliate who needs to make content available soon. Note that any new user accounts created after September 22, 2024 will need to be recreated by the user in November after our migration is completed.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDuran, Katrina
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-21T00:16:54Z
dc.date.available2024-09-21T00:16:54Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citation10 Ariz. J. Envtl. L. & Pol’y 241 (2019-2020)
dc.identifier.issn2161-9050
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/675225
dc.description.abstractThis Note examines the systematic mismanagement of wild horses and burros on America’s public lands and proposes a cooperative solution to these problems. America’s wild horses and burros have faced a long history of abuse which led to their protection under the Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act of 1971 (WHBA). However, between trying to work within the structure of an almost-50- year-old statute and a tight federal budget, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has not been able to find a proper balance between a thriving horse population and an overcrowded one. This Note proposes possible solutions to this problem. Cooperative federalism, voluntary intergovernmental agreements, or even proactive state legislation are all viable options that would allow the wild horses and burros to thrive on America’s public lands. In this instance, cooperative federalism seeks to set strict guidelines for states to meet in order for state governments to take over the care of these animals. Intergovernmental agreements would allow non-federal governments to take over the “smaller” tasks related to wild horses and burros in order to allow the Federal Government to focus on the task of long-term management and care of horses and burros in off-site holding facilities. Finally, proactive state legislating allows state governments to assume the care and control of horses and burros and it allows states to make the rules and suit them to their own state needs and resources.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherThe University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law (Tucson, AZ)
dc.relation.urlhttps://ajelp.com/
dc.rightsCopyright © The Author(s).
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.sourceHein Online
dc.titleThe Mustang Spirit of the West: How Taking a More Cooperative Approach Will Save Our Mustangs
dc.typeArticle
dc.typetext
dc.identifier.journalArizona Journal of Environmental Law & Policy
dc.description.collectioninformationThis material published in Arizona Journal of Environmental Law & Policy is made available by the James E. Rogers College of Law, the Daniel F. Cracchiolo Law Library, and the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact the AJELP Editorial Board at https://ajelp.com/contact-us.
dc.source.journaltitleArizona Journal of Environmental Law & Policy
dc.source.volume10
dc.source.issue2
refterms.dateFOA2024-09-21T00:16:54Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
AJELP_10_241_2020.pdf
Size:
274.3Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record