Phenological patterns and adaptations in an Artemisia/Agropyron plant community
Issue Date
1990-07-01Keywords
temporal distributionPseudoroegneria spicata
distribution
British Columbia
adaptation
soil water content
growth rate
Artemisia tridentata
plant communities
spatial distribution
drought
range management
phenology
botanical composition
forage
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Pitt, M. D., & Wikeem, B. M. (1990). Phenological patterns and adaptations in an Artemisia/Agropyron plant community. Journal of Range Management, 43(4), 350-358.Publisher
Society for Range ManagementJournal
Journal of Range ManagementDOI
10.2307/3898931Additional Links
https://rangelands.org/Abstract
The phenology of 75 plant species belonging to an Artemesia tridentata Nutt./Agropyron spicutum (Pursh.) Scribn. & Smith plant community in southern British Columbia was recorded in 1978 and 1979. Plant species were classified witbin 4 phenological groups that are hypothesized to reflect adaptation to spatial and temporal distribution of soil moisture. Summer Mature taxa (36 species, including 20 perennial forbs and 10 annual grasses and forbs) initiate growth early, fIower rapidly, and mature before or soon after summer drought began. Favorable moisture conditions in the fall may produce some regrowth. Summer Quiescent taxa (27 species, including 8 of 9 perennial grasses) also initiate growth early in spring, develop fairly rapidly, but flower later than Summer Mature taxa, becoming only semidormant during summer drought. Significant regrowth often occurs in response to fall moisture. Protracted Growth taxa (4 species) display delayed spring growth, followed by fall flowering. These deeply rooted shrubs continue to grow and develop slowly throughout the frost-free period. Eight, generally shallowly rooted forbs were classified as Spring Ephemerals that initiate development very early in spring, flower and terminate growth before summer drought, and rarely resprout in fall. These 4 phenological groups provide flushes in botanical composition, forage production, and nutrient availability that should be reflected witbin grazing management and rangeland inventory programs.Type
textArticle
Language
enISSN
0022-409Xae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.2307/3898931