Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHart, R. H.
dc.contributor.authorAshby, M. M.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-23T05:56:07Z
dc.date.available2020-09-23T05:56:07Z
dc.date.issued1998-07-01
dc.identifier.citationHart, R. H., & Ashby, M. M. (1998). Grazing intensities, vegetation, and heifer gains: 55 years on shortgrass. Journal of Range Management, 51(4), 392-398.
dc.identifier.issn0022-409X
dc.identifier.doi10.2307/4003323
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/644109
dc.description.abstractShortgrass rangeland, dominated by blue grama (Bouteloua gracilis [H.B.K.] Lag. ex Steud), was grazed at 3 intensities, equivalent to mean stocking rates of 16.7, 23.0, and 36.5 heifer-days ha-1, from 1939 through 1994. Few changes in plant communities had been documented by the early 1970's. In 1992-1994, frequency of occurrence, basal and foliar cover, and biomass at peak standing crop (PSC) were determined on the remaining pasture at each grazing intensity, and on 3 ungrazed exclosures. Blue grama and buffalograss (Buchloe dactyloides [Nutt.] Engelm.) increased, and western wheatgrass (Pascopyrum smithii [Rydb.] A. Love) and needle-and-thread (Stipa comata Trin. &Rupr.) decreased, as grazing intensity increased. Redthree-awn (Aristida longiseta Steud.) was most plentiful under light grazing. Basal cover and biomass of forbs were lower under grazing than in exclosures, but differences in biomass were not significant. Shrubs and half-shrubs decreased as grazing intensity increased. Frequency and cover of plains pricklypear (Opuntia polyacantha Haw.) were higher in the exclosures and under light grazing than under moderate or heavy grazing; biomass was 4 to 6 times as high in the exclosures as under any grazing intensity. Heifer gains declined linearly with increasing grazing pressure index. Optimum (most profitable) stocking rate was about 20% higher than that under the moderate grazing intensity, under which biomass production was maintained and shrub and pricklypear remained at low levels. Returns to land, labor, and management were only slightly higher under the optimum stocking rate than under the moderate grazing intensity. The moderate grazing intensity appears to be both profitable and sustainable.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © Society for Range Management.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectlong term experiments
dc.subjectground cover
dc.subjectliveweight gain
dc.subjectstocking rate
dc.subjectheifers
dc.subjectsustainability
dc.subjectgrazing intensity
dc.subjectbiomass
dc.subjectplant litter
dc.subjectbotanical composition
dc.subjectColorado
dc.titleGrazing intensities, vegetation, and heifer gains: 55 years on shortgrass
dc.typetext
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Range Management
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.description.admin-noteMigrated from OJS platform August 2020
dc.source.volume51
dc.source.issue4
dc.source.beginpage392-398
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-23T05:56:07Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
9328-9209-1-PB.pdf
Size:
852.4Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record