Issue Date
1997-03-01Keywords
forage productionnet present value
valuation
microclimate
sowing
seedbed preparation
risk
soil temperature
economic analysis
production costs
arid lands
stand establishment
crop production
Bouteloua gracilis
Texas
range management
Eragrostis lehmanniana
introduced species
rangelands
soil water
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Ethridge, D. E., Sherwood, R. D., Sosebee, R. E., & Herbel, C. H. (1997). Economic feasibility of rangeland seeding in the arid south-west. Journal of Range Management, 50(2), 185-190.Publisher
Society for Range ManagementJournal
Journal of Range ManagementDOI
10.2307/4002379Additional Links
https://rangelands.org/Abstract
Results from 6 years of seeding trials in the Chihuahuan Desert indicated that establishment of introduced and native grass species responded directly to soil moisture at the 1.22 cm (0.5 in) depth, soil temperature at the 5.08 cm (2 in) depth, and seedbed preparations of mulching and pits. The economic analysis indicated that seeding is not an advisable financial investment in the region under general circumstances. It also showed that when seeding is deemed necessary the best native species economic alternatives are blue grama [Bouteloma gracilis (H.B.K.) Griffiths] with either no seedbed preparation or with post seedbed preparation of mulch. The best introduced species economic alternative is Lehmann lovegrass (Eragrostis lehmanniana Nees.), with no seedbed preparation.Type
textArticle
Language
enISSN
0022-409Xae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.2307/4002379