Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorClark, P. E.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-18T05:05:58Z
dc.date.available2020-09-18T05:05:58Z
dc.date.issued2003-01-01
dc.identifier.citationClark, P. E. (2003). Date and plant community effects on elk sedge forage quality. Journal of Range Management, 56(1), 21-26.
dc.identifier.issn0022-409X
dc.identifier.doi10.2307/4003876
dc.identifier.doi10.2458/azu_jrm_v56i1_clark
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/643711
dc.description.abstractElk sedge (Carex geyeri Boott) is one of the most important livestock and big game forages in many areas of the western U.S. It is one of the most prominent forage species in the diets of cattle and elk utilizing forested rangelands. Despite its acknowledged ecological and economical importance, very little is known about the factors influencing the forage quality of elk sedge. Effects of sampling date, plant community, and their interaction on the neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber, and crude protein levels of elk sedge are reported for samples collected at the Starkey Experimental Forest and Range and the Bridge Creek Wildlife Management Area, both in northeastern Oregon, during January, April, July, and October of 1997 and 1998. Neutral detergent fiber levels in elk sedge were lowest in mid-October (average = 71.3%) and highest in mid-July (average = 76.1%). Acid detergent fiber was lowest in elk sedge collected in mid-October (average = 37.3%) and highest in mid-July (average = 39.0%) and mid-January (average = 39.2%). Elk sedge from the Douglas-fir/ninebark community was lowest in acid detergent fiber (average= 38.1%). Crude protein was highest (average = 8.0%) in mid-July elk sedge samples and lowest (average = 5.7%) in mid-January samples. Elk sedge from the ponderosa pine/fescue community was lowest in crude protein (average = 5.9%). All forage quality parameters exhibited variability between years. Although sampling date and plant community effects were detected, the forage quality of elk sedge appeared relatively stable compared to other native forages. A more intensive spring sampling campaign is needed to characterize the relationship between elk sedge phenology and forage quality dynamics.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © Society for Range Management.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectPhysocarpus opulifolius
dc.subjectdate
dc.subjectFestuca
dc.subjectCarex geyeri
dc.subjectCarex
dc.subjectprotein content
dc.subjectPinus ponderosa
dc.subjectfiber content
dc.subjectPseudotsuga menziesii
dc.subjectchemical composition
dc.subjectOregon
dc.subjectcrude protein
dc.subjectplant communities
dc.subjectphenology
dc.subjectseasonal variation
dc.subjectbotanical composition
dc.subjectnutritive value
dc.subjectforage
dc.subjectCarex geyeri
dc.subjectcattle
dc.subjectgraminoids
dc.subjectnutrition
dc.subjectphenology
dc.subjectseason
dc.titleDate and plant community effects on elk sedge forage quality
dc.typetext
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Range Management
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.description.admin-noteMigrated from OJS platform August 2020
dc.source.volume56
dc.source.issue1
dc.source.beginpage21-26
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-18T05:05:59Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
9767-9648-1-PB.pdf
Size:
613.5Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record