Issue Date
2002-03-01Keywords
photointerpretationshade
salmon
temperature gradients
fishery management
thermal infrared imagery
forward looking infrared radiometer
data analysis
water flow
water temperature
data collection
aerial photography
infrared imagery
streams
watershed management
remote sensing
equations
water quality
water flow
stream temperature
FLIR imaging
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Larson, S. L., Larson, L. L., & Larson, P. A. (2002). Perspectives on water flow and the interpretation of FLIR images. Journal of Range Management, 55(2), 106-111.Publisher
Society for Range ManagementJournal
Journal of Range ManagementAdditional Links
https://rangelands.org/Abstract
Airborne infrared thermal radiography has been proposed as a tool which may be used to monitor the water temperature along the network of streams and rivers which compose a watershed. The proponents of this method correlate vegetative shadows on a stream channel with reduced infrared radiation (IR) reception in the radiographic data to suggest that the water temperature is reduced in such areas. Two methods are employed to demonstrate that this interpretation of the data is in error. First, the fundamental principles of thermodynamics are employed to show that if the stream is in fact flowing, the water affected by any cooling process cannot remain in the vicinity where it was cooled. Second, temperature data taken from a stream channel are used to show that the water flowing in the channel is essentially unaffected by the patterns of vegetative shade on the surface of the channel.Type
textArticle
Language
enISSN
0022-409Xae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.2307/4003344