Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorProsser, C. W.
dc.contributor.authorSkinner, K. M.
dc.contributor.authorSedivec, K. K.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-18T04:03:12Z
dc.date.available2020-09-18T04:03:12Z
dc.date.issued2003-09-01
dc.identifier.citationProsser, C. W., Skinner, K. M., & Sedivec, K. K. (2003). Comparison of 2 techniques for monitoring vegetation on military lands. Journal of Range Management, 56(5), 446-454.
dc.identifier.issn0022-409X
dc.identifier.doi10.2307/4003835
dc.identifier.doi10.2458/azu_jrm_v56i5_prosser
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/643463
dc.description.abstractThe U.S. Army is responsible for preparing a well-trained combat force while maintaining the ecological diversity and integrity of the lands it manages. The ability to efficiently collect data that accurately capture plant community diversity and percent composition is imperative to proper monitoring and land management of military lands. To ensure that the dual goals of military training and land stewardship are met on an army-wide basis, the U.S. Army Land Condition-Trend Analysis (LCTA) Program was developed. The LCTA Program specifies the Army's standard methodology for the collection, analysis, and reporting of natural resource data used for land inventory and monitoring. However, the LCTA sampling technique was developed in Colorado and Texas and little information is available on whether these methods are suitable for vegetation inventory and monitoring in other grassland ecosystems. This study compares LCTA measures of species richness and composition with quadrat sampling in the transitional area between the tall- and mixed-grass prairies of Camp Gilbert C. Grafton (South Unit) in North Dakota. Species richness was 67% higher when sampling with quadrats than using the LCTA technique, suggesting that LCTA samples did not detect a third of the plants present. Compared with the quadrat technique, LCTA samples overestimated the community contribution of Bouteloua gracilis (H.B.K.) Lag. ex Steud. (blue grama) and underestimated proportions of forbs and sedges. Moreover, LCTA samples are labor intensive and time consuming to collect. Other sampling methods may be needed to detect shifts in species composition towards a less desirable plant community or decreases in biodiversity that may be due to land-use. Thus, it is important for Camp Gilbert C. Grafton (South Unit) to re-evaluate the current standard methodology for monitoring the impacts of military training. Since military installations are located in many different ecosystems, it may be necessary for other installations to likewise examine the usefulness of LCTA techniques in their ecosystems.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © Society for Range Management.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectElymus caninus
dc.subjectLand Condition-Trend Analysis
dc.subjectquadrat sampling
dc.subjectmilitary lands
dc.subjectHelianthus
dc.subjectArtemisia frigida
dc.subjectdata collection
dc.subjectenvironmental monitoring
dc.subjectBromus inermis
dc.subjectland management
dc.subjectCarex
dc.subjectPoa pratensis
dc.subjectsampling
dc.subjectforbs
dc.subjectBouteloua gracilis
dc.subjectplant communities
dc.subjectprairies
dc.subjectbotanical composition
dc.subjectrangelands
dc.subjectStipa
dc.subjectNorth Dakota
dc.subjectdiversity
dc.subjectspecies richness
dc.subjectgrassland vegetation
dc.subjectplant community
dc.subjectprairies
dc.subjectLand Coalition Trend Analysis
dc.titleComparison of 2 techniques for monitoring vegetation on military lands
dc.typetext
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Range Management
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Journal of Range Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.description.admin-noteMigrated from OJS platform August 2020
dc.source.volume56
dc.source.issue5
dc.source.beginpage446-454
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-18T04:03:12Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
9826-9707-1-PB.pdf
Size:
976.6Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record