Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKohl, Michel T.
dc.contributor.authorKrausman, Paul R.
dc.contributor.authorKunkel, Kyran
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, David M.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-05T06:36:45Z
dc.date.available2020-09-05T06:36:45Z
dc.date.issued2013-11-01
dc.identifier.citationKohl, M. T., Krausman, P. R., Kunkel, K., & Williams, D. M. (2013). Bison versus cattle: are they ecologically synonymous?. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 66(6), 721-731.
dc.identifier.issn0022-409X
dc.identifier.doi10.2111/REM-D-12-00113.1
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/642759
dc.description.abstractHistorically, the plains bison (Bison bison Linnaeus) was the most numerous and influential grazer on the Great Plains. Today 500 000 bison occupy North America among more than 100 000 000 cattle. In an attempt to restore their historical ecological role, bison are translocated onto landscapes previously manipulated for cattle use through water and fence development. We hypothesized that bison would use these landscapes similarly to cattle, thus maintaining homogenous grazing and reducing the restoration potential of bison at a landscape scale. We quantified differences between bison populations at different locations and spatial scales (American Prairie Reserve, Malta, Montana, USA, and Grasslands National Park, Val Marie, Saskatchewan, Canada, 2010-2011) and bison and cattle at similar locations and spatial scales using behavioral observations, movement analyses, and resource selection functions. Bison and cattle differed in all behaviors (grazing, standing, bedded, moving, other); however, landscape attributes resulted in behavior differences within species. Cattle spent a higher proportion of time grazing (45-49%) than bison (26-28%) and increased time at water. Bison moved at a 50-99% faster rate than cattle, and first passage time movement analyses identified selection of bison foraging patches (11 690 ha) larger than cattle foraging patches (48-615 ha). Similar to cattle, bison avoided most vegetation communities in relation to riparian communities and selected areas closer to water. Cattle selected for high plant biomass, whereas bison selected for intermediate plant biomass. This study has implications when bison and cattle are used to meet prairie restoration objectives. For bison, large landscapes that include variation in topography and vegetation communities are required. Furthermore, limiting manmade water sources may facilitate bison grazing patterns that more closely approximate historical bison use. For livestock, reduced movement and increased time spent grazing encourage grazing practices that increase heterogeneous grazing at a pasture scale.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociety for Range Management
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rightsCopyright © Society for Range Management.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectbehavior
dc.subjectfirst-passage time
dc.subjectgrazing
dc.subjectheterogeneity
dc.subjectresource selection
dc.subjectwater
dc.titleBison Versus Cattle: Are They Ecologically Synonymous?
dc.typetext
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.journalRangeland Ecology & Management
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Rangeland Ecology & Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.description.admin-noteMigrated from OJS platform August 2020
dc.source.volume66
dc.source.issue6
dc.source.beginpage721-731
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-05T06:36:45Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
23464-45245-1-PB.pdf
Size:
1.051Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record