Foliar Applications of Hydro-Gro and UAN 32 on Overseeded Bermudagrass Greens Turf
| dc.contributor.author | Kopec, David M. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Gilbert, Jeff J. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pessarakli, Mohammad | |
| dc.contributor.author | Nolan, Steve | |
| dc.contributor.editor | Kopec, David M. | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2012-03-26T18:05:05Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2012-03-26T18:05:05Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2009-02 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/216659 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Hydro-Gro ( 10-0-0) and UAN 32 (32-0-0) were applied once every 10, 15 or 30 days on a bermudagrass green overseeded with Poa trivialis at the rate of 9.0 lbs. PLS/M in mid October, 2007. Regardless of application frequency, each product was applied to achieve a 020. lb./N/1000 ft² nitrogen rate. Hydro-Gro produced a darker green turf than did the UAN, when averaged over all application timings. Enhanced turfgrass color was more consistent when Hydro-Gro was applied every 15 days (2x/monthly) compared to the 10 and 30 day application timings of this product. For the UAN source, no single application timing scheme produced a consistently darker Poa trivialis turf compared to any other application timing for the same product. Turfgrass quality was slightly greater on average for Hydro-Gro than that of the UAN treatments, although each source produced a better quality turf at one time or another within the two month application / evaluation period (Nov 15, 2007 to Jan 3, 2008). The addition of supplemental P and K did not enhance visual color or quality for either of these N source products from November to early January. Neither N source, their application timings, or the addition of supplemental P and K had any affect on turfgrass density, texture or overall uniformity. | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.publisher | College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | AZ1487 | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Series P-155 | en_US |
| dc.subject | Agriculture -- Arizona | en_US |
| dc.subject | Turfgrasses -- Arizona | en_US |
| dc.subject | Turf management -- Arizona | en_US |
| dc.subject | Plants, ornamental -- Arizona | en_US |
| dc.subject | Turfgrasses -- Fertility | en_US |
| dc.title | Foliar Applications of Hydro-Gro and UAN 32 on Overseeded Bermudagrass Greens Turf | en_US |
| dc.type | text | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.journal | Turfgrass, Landscape and Urban IPM Research Summary | en_US |
| refterms.dateFOA | 2018-06-25T21:57:35Z | |
| html.description.abstract | Hydro-Gro ( 10-0-0) and UAN 32 (32-0-0) were applied once every 10, 15 or 30 days on a bermudagrass green overseeded with Poa trivialis at the rate of 9.0 lbs. PLS/M in mid October, 2007. Regardless of application frequency, each product was applied to achieve a 020. lb./N/1000 ft² nitrogen rate. Hydro-Gro produced a darker green turf than did the UAN, when averaged over all application timings. Enhanced turfgrass color was more consistent when Hydro-Gro was applied every 15 days (2x/monthly) compared to the 10 and 30 day application timings of this product. For the UAN source, no single application timing scheme produced a consistently darker Poa trivialis turf compared to any other application timing for the same product. Turfgrass quality was slightly greater on average for Hydro-Gro than that of the UAN treatments, although each source produced a better quality turf at one time or another within the two month application / evaluation period (Nov 15, 2007 to Jan 3, 2008). The addition of supplemental P and K did not enhance visual color or quality for either of these N source products from November to early January. Neither N source, their application timings, or the addition of supplemental P and K had any affect on turfgrass density, texture or overall uniformity. |
