Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorThompson, G.
dc.contributor.editorButler, Marvinen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-03-14T17:53:05Z
dc.date.available2012-03-14T17:53:05Z
dc.date.issued1988-12
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/215711
dc.description.abstractThe effects of the navel orange prorate suspension on packinghouse to retail price spreads are analyzed When compared with price spreads for the 1986 season, F.o.b.-retail price spreads declined for Atlanta and San Francisco, but increased for Dallas.
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCollege of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSeries P-76en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries370076en_US
dc.subjectAgriculture -- Arizonaen_US
dc.subjectCitrus fruits -- Arizonaen_US
dc.titleThe Effects of Navel Orange Prorate Suspension on F. O. B. to Retail Price Spreadsen_US
dc.typetexten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.journalCitrus Research Reporten_US
refterms.dateFOA2018-06-25T01:17:01Z
html.description.abstractThe effects of the navel orange prorate suspension on packinghouse to retail price spreads are analyzed When compared with price spreads for the 1986 season, F.o.b.-retail price spreads declined for Atlanta and San Francisco, but increased for Dallas.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
370076-001-004.pdf
Size:
71.58Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record