• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Colleges, Departments, and Organizations
    • College of Agriculture, Life & Environmental Sciences (CALES) Publications
    • Production Reports
    • Citrus Reports
    • Citrus Research Report 2004
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Colleges, Departments, and Organizations
    • College of Agriculture, Life & Environmental Sciences (CALES) Publications
    • Production Reports
    • Citrus Reports
    • Citrus Research Report 2004
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UA Campus RepositoryCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournalThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournal

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    AboutUA Faculty PublicationsUA DissertationsUA Master's ThesesUA Honors ThesesUA PressUA YearbooksUA CatalogsUA Libraries

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Chemical Control and Integrated Pest Management of Woolly Whitefly

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    az1427-10-2004.pdf
    Size:
    87.70Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Author
    Kerns, David L.
    Issue Date
    2004
    Keywords
    Agriculture -- Arizona
    Citrus fruits -- Arizona
    Citrus -- Insect pest management
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Publisher
    College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ)
    Journal
    Citrus Research Report
    Abstract
    Five foliar insecticide treatments (Esteem, two rates of Provado, two rates of Applaud, Prev-am, and Danitol + Lorsban) were evaluated for their control of woolly whitefly infestations in grapefruit. All of these products demonstrated efficacy in mitigating woolly whitefly populations. Danitol + Lorsban was the best knock-down treatment evaluated, but for sustained control, Esteem appeared to be most effective. Applaud demonstrated good activity, but the rate we tested may be a little low; the 1.0 lb/ac rate should be evaluated. Provado at 19 oz/ac was a good treatment, while the 10 oz/ac rate appears to be sub-par. Prev-am is a oil based contact material and demonstrated good initial activity. Soil injections of 16 and 32 oz/ac of Admire were very effective against WWF, and there were no detectable differences between the two rates. Previous experiments with soil injections of Admire in citrus suggested that as much as six weeks needs to pass before the trees have enough time to adequately take up the Admire from the soil. However, these data suggest that smaller trees, about 10 ft tall, may require as little as two weeks to pick up the material.
    Series/Report no.
    AZ1427
    Series P-149
    Sponsors
    Arizona Citrus Research Council
    Collections
    Citrus Research Report 2004

    entitlement

     
    The University of Arizona Libraries | 1510 E. University Blvd. | Tucson, AZ 85721-0055
    Tel 520-621-6442 | repository@u.library.arizona.edu
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2017  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.